Assignment #2 or I Fought Food-poisoning for This
Every new invention brings with it opposing arguments that either praise the advancements that this new technology will usher in or condemn the technology as destroying something that is treasured by the society into which it was born. Two very different authors Vannevar Bush and Nathaniel Hawthorne tackled the question asking is technology a good thing or something bad in connection with a new technology of their times, the memex and the air-tight stove respectively.
Bush practically gushes as he describes his latest idea for an invention, the "memex." Highlighting its benefits for mankind, Bush takes no notice of its potential unfavorable outcomes. "A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory" (Bush). He is quick to point out this new piece of technology’s uses and advantages. Vannevar is very much in the pro-technology camp of arguing.
Hawthorne examines the latest technology of his day, the air-tight stove. He acknowledges the advances that this technology provides such as more efficient heating of ones home to the advances in fire safety it provides. Despite all this Nathaniel Hawthorne still sees this new technology as an unhappy thing for society. He preaches that "it is my[his] belief, that social intercourse cannot long continue what it has been, now that we have subtracted from it so important and vivifying an element as fire-light" (Hawthorne). He focuses on negative social changes that will result from the implementation of the new technology.
Looking at these two contrasting view points and applying them to a new technology of my time, I am faced with vilifying or applauding the technology that is the internet. Unlike Bush I am not going to turn a blind eye to the negative aspects of the technology, but instead will state the negative from the beginning. From that starting point I will proceed to argue that the positive implications of the internet greatly outweigh any negative consequences.
The internet is not with out its faults. Indeed more and more of these flaws are becoming known everyday. Children are subject to being preyed upon by internet pedophiles and people are inventing new addictions centered around the internet, such as porn, shopping, and online gambling. These faults that I find in embracing the internet in my opinion would still exist without this technology’s presence. Pedophiles still prey upon children although they may now have access to children from upper class families thanks to the internet and people can feed the addictions with out the internet and would continue to do so in the future were the internet taken away.
The internet I would argue is a very great advance in technology of our time and should be embraced. The internet allows people from across cultures and sub-cultures to share ideas and exchange information. Imagine we are stepping into a future where distance no longer holds up any resistance to the exchange of ideals. Blogs in particular play an important and positive role in the technology of the internet. Blogs allow people to express their ideas and opinions in a semi-anonymous way. The person who is blogging does not feel pressure to conform to a social norm on the internet since the writer does not have to deal with face to face critiques of their work. This helps ideas that might have otherwise been stifled with out this new technology to instead flourish.
The internet and blogging serves another great purpose besides helping their authors find a voice. These blogs have a positive influence on the readers as well. Blogs can help individuals find friends on the internet. For example, a blog put out on the internet by a gay person could help a lonely gay youth find someone who is like them. They might find that they can talk to this blogger about feelings and emotions they have without with the fear of being dropped by family and friends or in the worst cases bashed that accompanies coming out to people you know in real life.
My personal blog that I created for this class is another positive application of this new technology. It allows me to articulate my understanding of the materials in a more relaxed manner. I have time to plan my responses and think over them, a luxury not often provided during class time. Blogs are helping me better understand the materials in this course as well as my peers interpretations of these materials. In what other medium would I be given the opportunity to read over and recall the points that others have made in regards to the work I too am doing?
Works Cited:
Bush, Vannevar. "As We May Think". The Atlantic Monthly: July 1945. Ed. Denys Duchier. Simon Fraser University. August 1995. 10 September 2006. http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier/pub/vbush/vbush-all.shtml
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. "Fire-Worship". Mosses from an Olde Manse. 1846. Eldritch Press. 10 September 2006. http://www.eldritchpress.org/nh/fw.html
Bush practically gushes as he describes his latest idea for an invention, the "memex." Highlighting its benefits for mankind, Bush takes no notice of its potential unfavorable outcomes. "A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory" (Bush). He is quick to point out this new piece of technology’s uses and advantages. Vannevar is very much in the pro-technology camp of arguing.
Hawthorne examines the latest technology of his day, the air-tight stove. He acknowledges the advances that this technology provides such as more efficient heating of ones home to the advances in fire safety it provides. Despite all this Nathaniel Hawthorne still sees this new technology as an unhappy thing for society. He preaches that "it is my[his] belief, that social intercourse cannot long continue what it has been, now that we have subtracted from it so important and vivifying an element as fire-light" (Hawthorne). He focuses on negative social changes that will result from the implementation of the new technology.
Looking at these two contrasting view points and applying them to a new technology of my time, I am faced with vilifying or applauding the technology that is the internet. Unlike Bush I am not going to turn a blind eye to the negative aspects of the technology, but instead will state the negative from the beginning. From that starting point I will proceed to argue that the positive implications of the internet greatly outweigh any negative consequences.
The internet is not with out its faults. Indeed more and more of these flaws are becoming known everyday. Children are subject to being preyed upon by internet pedophiles and people are inventing new addictions centered around the internet, such as porn, shopping, and online gambling. These faults that I find in embracing the internet in my opinion would still exist without this technology’s presence. Pedophiles still prey upon children although they may now have access to children from upper class families thanks to the internet and people can feed the addictions with out the internet and would continue to do so in the future were the internet taken away.
The internet I would argue is a very great advance in technology of our time and should be embraced. The internet allows people from across cultures and sub-cultures to share ideas and exchange information. Imagine we are stepping into a future where distance no longer holds up any resistance to the exchange of ideals. Blogs in particular play an important and positive role in the technology of the internet. Blogs allow people to express their ideas and opinions in a semi-anonymous way. The person who is blogging does not feel pressure to conform to a social norm on the internet since the writer does not have to deal with face to face critiques of their work. This helps ideas that might have otherwise been stifled with out this new technology to instead flourish.
The internet and blogging serves another great purpose besides helping their authors find a voice. These blogs have a positive influence on the readers as well. Blogs can help individuals find friends on the internet. For example, a blog put out on the internet by a gay person could help a lonely gay youth find someone who is like them. They might find that they can talk to this blogger about feelings and emotions they have without with the fear of being dropped by family and friends or in the worst cases bashed that accompanies coming out to people you know in real life.
My personal blog that I created for this class is another positive application of this new technology. It allows me to articulate my understanding of the materials in a more relaxed manner. I have time to plan my responses and think over them, a luxury not often provided during class time. Blogs are helping me better understand the materials in this course as well as my peers interpretations of these materials. In what other medium would I be given the opportunity to read over and recall the points that others have made in regards to the work I too am doing?
Works Cited:
Bush, Vannevar. "As We May Think". The Atlantic Monthly: July 1945. Ed. Denys Duchier. Simon Fraser University. August 1995. 10 September 2006. http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier/pub/vbush/vbush-all.shtml
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. "Fire-Worship". Mosses from an Olde Manse. 1846. Eldritch Press. 10 September 2006. http://www.eldritchpress.org/nh/fw.html
